Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Dept of Energy Conditional Commitment Letter in Fisker Automotive loan

Yesterday it was announced that Fisker Automotive reportedly lays off workers in wake of missing DoE loan milestones .. The Dept of Energy loan program milestones are documented in the following letter.

Also, see this report from April 2010 when Fisker's loan program was approved.  Fisker Automotive secures the Dept of Energy loan, allowing them to reopen old GM plant in Delaware
Dept of Energy Conditional Commitment Letter in Fisker Automotive loan

Monday, February 6, 2012

Fisker Automotive reportedly lays off workers in wake of missing DoE loan milestones

Fisker Automotive was one of the automakers receiving Dept of Energy low-interest loan guarantees in the summer of 2009.  The company focuses on designing and manufacturing high end luxury plug-in electric vehicles.

The loan program has required milestones that Fisker must meet before each segment of the loan is unlocked.  Fisker has failed to meet some of the milestones, resulting in the Dept of Energy locking their loan.


“Our loan guarantees have strict conditions in place to protect taxpayers,” Damien LaVera, an Energy Department spokesman. “The department only allows the loan to be disbursed as the company meets certain milestones and demonstrates results.”


“To date we have received $193 million of the $529 million Department of Energy loan, mostly for the Karma program, and received our last reimbursement in May 2011,” Fisker spokesman Roger Ormisher said in a statement Monday. “We are renegotiating some terms of the DOE agreement for the $336 million balance of the loan related to the Project Nina program.”

“A flex model of expanding and contracting staffing for development of new cars is routine in the automotive industry,” Ormisher wrote. “Project Nina is already well-advanced. Much of the engineering, design and development is near complete and we expect to ramp up operations again quickly.”

"We are frustrated that Fisker and the DOE have been unable to come to terms on revisions to their loan agreement in time to avoid this," said Brian Selander, a spokesman for Delaware Gov. Jack Markell.

"They had not geared up yet because they're still behind schedule on the Karma," said Delaware economic development director Alan Levin.  Levin went on to say "We knew that this was always a possibility, what they're trying to do is conserve cash."

“While some wanted to write off America’s auto industry, we said no. We knew that we needed to do something different – in Delaware and all across the nation,” Vice President Joe Biden said about Fisker in Delaware in 2009. “We understood a new chapter had to be written, a new chapter in which we strengthen American manufacturing by investing in innovation. Thanks to a real commitment by this Administration, loans from the Department of Energy, the creativity of U.S. companies and the tenacity of great state partners like Delaware – we’re on our way to helping America’s auto industry reclaim its top position in the global market.”

“Our loan guarantees have strict conditions in place to protect taxpayers. The Department only allows the loan to be disbursed as the company meets certain milestones and demonstrates results. As has been widely reported, Fisker has experienced some delays in its sales and production schedule -- which is common for start-ups. As Fisker works through those issues and incorporates lessons learned from the production of the Karma, the Department is working with Fisker to review a revised business plan and determine the best path forward so the company can meet its benchmarks, produce cars and employ workers here in America," DOE spokesman Damien LaVera said in a statement.

Fisker says with Project Nina, it has “completed Phase One of the re-commissioning of a former General Motors plant in Wilmington, Delaware,” and will first focus on selling the Karma in 2012, and then later on focus on the Nina. Fisker was originally shooting to manufacture Project Nina electric cars at a volume of 75,000 to 100,000 per year starting in 2012.
Fisker Automotive reportedly lays off workers in wake of missing DoE loan milestones

Fisker Auto’s Delaware Project ‘Delayed’ as Energy Department Freezes Loan

Fisker lays off 26 in Delaware, 45 in California

Electric car maker Fisker: Layoffs in Del., Calif.

Clean energy loan recipient lays off staff

Electric car startup Fisker quietly piles on more funding

Fisker suspends work on Project Nina, lays off workers

Valence Technology wins patent dispute against Hydro-Quebec in European Patent Office

The Lithium-Iron-Phosphate battery chemistry is widely regarded as safe, but there's been this patent dispute issue.  The chemistry was developed at a battery research laboratory at U Texas (Austin) who then licensed the patent to Hydro-Quebec.  Several companies are making Lithium-Iron-Phosphate (LiFePO4) batteries under license from HQ, but at the same time several are making them while not having a license.  Which has led to a flurry of lawsuits against those companies, and one of those companies is Valence Technology of Austin Texas.

Today's news is big.  It's that Valence has decisively won a patent fight against Hydro-Quebec, resulting in the invalidation of HQ's patent in Europe.



February 6, 2012

Valence Technology Wins European Patent Appeal

Hydro-Quebec Appeal Dismissed


AUSTIN, TexasFeb. 6, 2012 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Valence Technology, Inc. (Nasdaq:VLNC), a leading U.S.-based global manufacturer of advanced energy storage solutions for commercial applications prevailed in seeking the dismissal of an appeal by Hydro-Quebec (HQ) of a decision of the European Patent Office revoking a HQ European patent. The EPO Patent corresponded to the primary HQ patent being litigated in the Western District of Texas Federal Court (Austin). The patent is related to lithium metal phosphate technology.

Valence had challenged the grant of European Patent number 0904607, originally held by the University of Texas and now assigned to HQ, in an opposition proceeding in the European Patent Office filed on July 27, 2005. In December 2008, the EPO Opposition Board revoked the grant of the patent based on evidence presented by Valence showing that the patent lacked novelty. The Board's decision revoking HQ's European Patent eliminated any risk that HQ could assert the European Patent against Valence's proprietary lithium iron magnesium phosphate cathode material, a critical material for the next generation of advanced batteries. HQ filed an appeal of the 2008 revocation of the European Patent. The appeal hearing was heard and decided on February 2, 2012, by an EPO Board of Appeal, which dismissed HQ's appeal. As a result of the decision, European Patent number 0904607 has been revoked by the EPO in its entirety. Valence was represented in the opposition and the appeal by Dr. Claus Beckmann of the German Intellectual Property Law firm Kraus & Weisert.

"This decision removes any possible patent infringement claim under the Hydro-Quebec European Patent, thereby affirming Valence's unrestricted right to market its unique, patented lithium phosphate powder batteries in Europe. Valence's intellectual property is a key asset and we intend to vigorously protect our worldwide patent estate," said Roger Williams, Valence's General Counsel.

About Valence Technology, Inc.

Valence Technology is a global leader in the development and manufacture of safe, long-life lithium iron magnesium phosphate advanced energy storage solutions and integrated command and control logic. Headquartered in Austin, Texas, Valence enables and powers some of the world's most innovative and environmentally friendly applications, ranging from commercial electric vehicles to industrial and marine equipment. Valence Technology today offers a proven technology and manufacturing infrastructure that delivers ISO-certified products and processes that are protected by an extensive global patent portfolio. In addition to the corporate headquarters in TexasValence Technology has its Research & Development Center inNevada, its Europe/Asia Pacific Sales office in Northern Ireland, manufacturing facilities in China, and global fulfillment centers in North America andEuropeValence Technology is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the ticker symbol "VLNC." For more information, visit www.valence.com.

Safe Harbor Statement

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 including our statements regarding protecting our worldwide patent estate. Actual results may vary substantially from these forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors including the outcome of any future litigation regarding our intellectual property, our ability to effectively protect our intellectual property rights in Europe and other countries, our ability to further develop our intellectual property rights including our patent portfolio, financial or other limitations on our ability to protect our intellectual property and the actual performance characteristics of our products. In addition, patents are geographically territorial and a decision on European patents generally affects the acts of making, using, selling and importing products utilizing such technology in Europe. Other risk factors that could affect our actual results are discussed in our periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011, and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and the reader is directed to these statements for a further discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements.
CONTACT: IR Contact:

         Bob Gray

         Valence Technology, Inc.

         512.527.2921

         investor@valence.com



         PR Contact:

         Jeff Fox

         The Blueshirt Group

         415.828.8298
 
jeff@blueshirtgroup.com 

Sunday, February 5, 2012

Chevy Volt sales drop between December 2011 and Jan 2012



The total number of Volts sold was 603 in January, according to GM. It was the worst month since August, when GM sold just 302 Volts, and is more than the 321 it sold in January last year.

This number is also well down from the Volt’s fourth quarter average of 1,259 sales per month.
Also retracted was Nissan which sold 676 Leafs in January, down from 954 in December.

GM North America President Mark Reuss also said the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration’s Volt battery investigation had an unquantified negative impact, and it will take time for Volt sales to rebound.

The Detroit News also reported Reuss saying when GM restarts production at the Detroit-Hamtramck Assembly plant this month, Volts will be built in a “very reasonable” volume, while noting some pent-up export demand.

As the carmaker stepped up its efforts to rebuild the reputation of the Volt, it began airing a commercial titled "Morning in Hamtramck" that portrays the extended-range electric car as part of the fabric of the Detroit enclave in which it is built.
Volt sales decrease in wake of ‘Batterygate’

Chevy Volt sales take a hit

GM: Bad publicity hurt Volt

Saturday, February 4, 2012

Federal role in the Electric Car Industry & Chevy Volt Battery Fire

This interview is with the Bloomberg News reporter who broke the Chevy Volt battery fire story.

It's a very interesting issue that goes beyond the Volt Battery Fire, and talks about a lot of issues around vehicle electrification and the geopolitical power implications of manufacturing electric vehicles and components in the U.S. versus using parts imported from other countries.


General Motors and the US Auto Industry

Interview with GM North American President Mark Reuss, talking about General Motors, in an interview from the Washington, D.C. Auto Show. He also responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. He also talked a bit about the Chevy Volt.  The House Oversight Committee meeting on the Chevy Volt Battery Fire had occurred the day before this interview.





China's Monopoly on Rare Earths: Implications for U.S. Foreign and Security Policy


Testimony before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific
Prepared Statement of Christine Parthemore
Fellow, Center for a New American Security





China's Monopoly on Rare Earths: Implications for U.S. Foreign and Security Policy